Stefano De Martino ha portato Affari Tuoi in cima all'Olimpo dell'Auditel ma continua ad essere messo in discussione come conduttore e showman. Lo si accusa di una tendenza all'autocompiacimento e si sottolinea un'impossibilità di paragone con modelli come Arbore o Fiorello. Le continue sottolineature dimostrano quanto in Italia il cambiamento possa inciampare in forme di ostruzionismo penalizzanti per la riuscita del cambiamento stesso.Continua a leggere
The main idea of the text is that criticism of Stefano De Martino's successful hosting of "Affari Tuoi" reveals a resistance to change in Italy.
The author argues that despite De Martino's high ratings and success in revitalizing the show, he is constantly compared to past hosts like Arbore and Fiorello, highlighting an inability to accept new styles and talent. This, according to the text, demonstrates a broader issue of "ostruzionismo" (obstructionism) in Italian culture, hindering progress and acceptance of new ideas.
Essentially, the text uses De Martino's case as a microcosm to illustrate a larger societal problem in Italy.
The main idea of the text is that criticism of Stefano De Martino's successful hosting of "Affari Tuoi" reveals a resistance to change in Italy. The author argues that despite De Martino's high ratings and success in revitalizing the show, he is constantly compared to past hosts like Arbore and Fiorello, highlighting an inability to accept new styles and talent. This, according to the text, demonstrates a broader issue of "ostruzionismo" (obstructionism) in Italian culture, hindering progress and acceptance of new ideas. Essentially, the text uses De Martino's case as a microcosm to illustrate a larger societal problem in Italy.
